Subject: RE: hardware xml / xslt
From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:24:18 +0100
|
> The comparison on our web site showed real results from a real customer.
> They had previously used Xalan, and we showed their before and after
> speeds. We regularly run benchmarks for prospective customers against a
> variety of XSLT processors, but this list isn't the place for those
> discussions.
>
> And now, back to XSLT ...
agreed !
have you guys actually run XSLTMark on your custom XSLT processor ?
cheers, jim fuller
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- Re: When to hand XSLT off to a specialized box (was: hardwarexml / xslt), (continued)
- Jeff Kenton - Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:36:31 -0400 (EDT)
- Joerg Heinicke - Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:29:56 -0400 (EDT)
- James Fuller - Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:45:26 -0400 (EDT)
- Jeff Kenton - Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:56:43 -0400 (EDT)
- James Fuller - Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:21:25 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Michael Kay - Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:43:33 -0400 (EDT)
- Robert Koberg - Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:30:30 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:13:01 -0400 (EDT)
- Robert Koberg - Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:09:31 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Cart
