[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re[2]: binary-or
From: Rubén <rubenm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:42:19 +0200
I must stick to XPath 1.1 for the moment, but it's good to know that. Thank you!


============================== Original Message ==============================
From: Rubén
To: Michael Kay
Date: Thursday, September 26, 2002, 12:42:59 PM
Subject:  binary-or

> Hello list! I couldn't find a "binary-or" (or "mask-or") 
> operation in XPath 1.1 so I tried to emulate it with a 
> template. I wrote a recursive implementation but I'm not very 
> happy with the result. I wonder if there is a simpler (and 
> maybe more efficient) solution. Any suggestions?
> 
You could use a sequence-of-booleans in XPath 2.0....

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

=========================== End Of Original Message ==========================


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
  • binary-or
    • Rubén - Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:28:54 -0400 (EDT)
      • Michael Kay - Thu, 26 Sep 2002 06:37:18 -0400 (EDT)
        • Rubén - Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:36:21 -0400 (EDT) <=
      • Rubén - Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:43:54 -0400 (EDT)
      • <Possible follow-ups>
      • Dion Houston - Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:56:22 -0400 (EDT)
        • Rubén - Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:42:27 -0400 (EDT)
      • McNally, David - Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:33:05 -0400 (EDT)
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member