Hi all:
There is an office controversy brewing about node normalization - where no elements have attributes, only dependent nodes. Supposedly there is an industry trend toward node normalization, and some are worried that we'll be out of sync. However, I have not found any documentation referencing this 'trend' - have you heard anything about this? Can anyone point to any resources for this discussion, or even any thoughts either way?
Currently we are using a mix of child nodes and attributes, and this seems intuitively logical to me - but this is the best argument I can make - I just like it better. ;-)
TIA,
Nik
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|