Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling count than this

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: a nicer total sibling count than this
From: "Stewart C. Russell" <scruss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:25:44 -0400

Michael Kay wrote:


Using position() and last() will often be more efficient than using
count() and xsl:number, because they work on the current node list,
which you are using anyway to output the nodes.

thanks for that. Efficiency is important here, as it's likely that such a template would be called in the order of tens to hundreds of thousands of times in a typical dictionary.

And here's me thinking that TIMTOWTDI only applied to Perl ... ;-)

cheers,
Stewart

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

a nicer total sibling count than this
- scruss - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:37:26 -0400 (EDT)
  - Message not available
    - Jeni Tennison - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
  - Wendell Piez - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:06:37 -0400 (EDT)
  - Michael Kay - Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:28:27 -0400 (EDT)
    - Stewart C. Russell - Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:23:29 -0400 (EDT) <=
  - <Possible follow-ups>
  - Macaulay,Malcolm (US) - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:04:08 -0400 (EDT)
    - Stewart C. Russell - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
  - scruss - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:35:19 -0400 (EDT)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: a nicer total sibling cou, Michael Kay	Thread	RE: a nicer total sibling cou, Macaulay,Malcolm (US
Re: Problem using MSXML, Mike Brown	Date	Re: replace < and > wit, Ming Yu
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >