Subject: RE: XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:13:41 +0100
|
>
> Will it do the same for X[name()='factorof' and position()=1] ?
>
I'm still thinking about that. XPath 1.0 doesn't allow the processor to
re-order the branches of an "and" expression (the behavior in error
cases might be different); but XPath 2.0 does allow it.
Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- RE: XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?, (continued)
- Johannes Döbler - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:57:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Wendell Piez - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:57:16 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
- Wendell Piez - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 17:49:48 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 2 Jul 2002 04:11:16 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Kevin Jones - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:16:57 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 2 Jul 2002 04:32:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Ranjith Kodikara - Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:08:45 -0400 (EDT)
- Antonio Fiol - Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:17:44 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Cart
