Subject: Re: Design question
From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:04:51 +0100
|
Hi Antonio,
>>The reason Jay couldn't use that is that for some arrangements of
>>parameters this would lead to attributes being added after child
>>elements have already been added to the da:Positive element, which
>>is an error in XSLT.
>
> I thought there was no concept of "before" and "after" on XSLT.
There has to be *some* concept of "before" and "after" in XSLT,
otherwise you wouldn't be able to specify the order of elements inside
other elements and things like xsl:sort would be pointless. But yes,
you're right that in general the order in which parts of the result
tree are generated by the processor doesn't matter; however in this
case it does. I imagine that this was to make it easier for processors
that don't do any funky parallel processing of templates to create a
(SAX) event stream of the result.
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Michael Kay - Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:06:12 -0400 (EDT)
Jay Burgess - Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:52:18 -0400 (EDT)
|
|