Subject: Re: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:13:57 +0100
|
> But if the content of an inline is only pcdata, does the formatter still
> break it David?
> I thought not?
[I know I'm not the David you mean but...] I'd certainly _expect_ them
to be broken. fo:inline is "inline" in the sense that an HTML <em> or a
latex \textbf{...} is inline, it's used to change some properties of
the text but the result is still part of the main text flow and takes
part in line breaking etc.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- RE: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
- DPawson - Fri, 5 Jul 2002 05:16:51 -0400 (EDT)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- DPawson - Fri, 5 Jul 2002 07:48:30 -0400 (EDT)
- David Carlisle - Fri, 5 Jul 2002 08:14:06 -0400 (EDT) <=
- DPawson - Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:23:14 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Cart
