Re: [xsl]   in XSL other than d-o-e ?

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re:   in XSL other than d-o-e ?
From: "Jochen Metzger" <j.metzger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:25:00 +0200

Hi,
> yes just use &#160; instead of all of that. &nbsp; is an entity defined
> to be #160 in ___HTML___ so if you are not using (X)HTML (for instance
> if you are using XSLT you either need to make a similar definition of
> nbsp or (more simply) just use &#160; directly.

Thanks for all your outstanding answers. That was really great stuff.

This mailing list is really kewl ;o)
I how I can contribute some stuff in the future.

Cheers

Jochen
 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE:   in XSL other than d-o-e ?, (continued) Julian Reschke - Fri, 19 Jul 2002 05:10:05 -0400 (EDT) Joerg Heinicke - Fri, 19 Jul 2002 05:14:09 -0400 (EDT) Jeni Tennison - Fri, 19 Jul 2002 05:31:36 -0400 (EDT) David Carlisle - Fri, 19 Jul 2002 05:48:31 -0400 (EDT) Jochen Metzger - Fri, 19 Jul 2002 07:28:39 -0400 (EDT) <= Jarno . Elovirta - Fri, 19 Jul 2002 05:39:08 -0400 (EDT)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re:   in XSL other than , David Carlisle	Thread	RE:   in XSL other than , Jarno . Elovirta
RE: The longest node in a nod, DPawson	Date	Re: strings and recursive tem, David Carlisle
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >