Unfortunately, <jsp:include> is interpreted
differently than <% include %> (or at least 
that was what I was told by JSP folks). The 
<% %> version is a compile-time include but 
<jsp:include> is run-time, so there are 
performance issues with using the xml syntax. 

Sara

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy McArthur [mailto:guym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 5:33 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  JSP includes in XSLT
> 
> 
> An option is to output the xml syntax for jsp 1.1/1.2:
>  
> E.g.
>  
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <?xsl-stylesheet href="default.xsl"?>
> <jsp:root 
> xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/dtd/jsp_1_0.dtd">
>     <jsp:directive.page import="java.io.*, java.util.*"/>
>  
> ...and so on... it is interpreted just like normal jsp.
>  
> --
> Guy McArthur * email{guym@xxxxxxxxxxx} http{guymcarthur.com}      
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list