Subject: Re: The Future of Browser-Bound XML?
From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 11:29:27 +0100
|
well now we have mathml, because xml no fun with numbers, kids.
so this brings us to 'mxxssfhcr', hmm a distinct lack of vowels, any
scrabble experts out there ?
cheers, jim fuller
----- Original Message -----
From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: The Future of Browser-Bound XML?
>
> Jim Fuller wrote:
> >xsxsfhcr ?
>
> uh, how would one pronounce that? :)
>
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Charles Ohana - Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:37:08 -0400 (EDT)
|
|