Subject: Re: processing-instruction()
From: Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:03:11 +0200
|
I read it and found David acknowedged, because the link to NodeTest
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#NT-NodeTest) states, that
processing-instruction('Literal') is a NodeTest too.
So there is a sentence in XSLT spec saying
processing-instruction('Literal') has priority of 0
and a in the XPATH spec merged with the XSLT spec a sentence saying
processing-instruction('Literal') has priority of -0.5
What about node() and * - do they have the same priority?
Really strange ;-)
Joerg
Jeni Tennison wrote:
David C. wrote:
Other than that it looks OK except
<xsl:template match="node()">
and
<xsl:template match="processing-instruction('Eqn')">
have the same default priority so you want to add priority="10" to
the processing-instruction ones.
Actually, I think the processing-instruction('Eqn') matching template
has a priority of 0 while the node() matching template has a priority
of -0.5:
...
* If the pattern has the form of a QName preceded by a
ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier *or has the form
processing-instruction(Literal)* preceded by a
ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier, then the priority is 0.
...
* Otherwise, if the pattern consists of just a NodeTest preceded
by a ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier, then the priority is -0.5.
...
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#conflict (my emphasis)
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
--
System Development
VIRBUS AG
Fon +49(0)341-979-7419
Fax +49(0)341-979-7409
joerg.heinicke@xxxxxxxxx
www.virbus.de
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
