Ouch! you're right.  Some of the interactivity
is tied. Sara

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastian Rahtz
> [mailto:sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 1:03 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  The Future of Browser-Bound XML?
> 
> 
> > today -- or just have browser aware output. And of course, 
> > it requires that your XML is already pretty much in order 
> > and fully complete for rendering. 
>  
> Unless I am mistaken, it also requires that CSS be enhanced.
> Suppose my otherwise ready-for-frying XML file contains 
> 
>  <xref url="www.microsoft.com">the gates of hell</xref>
> and
>  <figure url="somestupidpenguin.jpg"/>
> 
> I never did understand how to explain via CSS that these
> are respectively a link and an inline image. is not CSS
> completely tied to the semantics of HTML elements?
> 
> -- 
> Sebastian Rahtz      OUCS Information Manager
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list