Subject: RE: Output XML doc with XSL doc name in comment
From: Mike Ferrando <mikeferrando@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 09:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
|
Dear Tom S.,
I appreciate your patience. I used the XSLT syntax that seemed
closest to my desired output. I am still new to XSLT.
By "hardcoding" do you mean keying in the name? I saw this done in
Kay's book (1st edition -- where he used other scripts to output a
date in the comment), but I have many stylesheets created. I wanted
something I could globally search and replace so that I would not
have to key each one. Laziness is the mother of invention. I am
still catching up with the long-sighted use XSLT.
Sincerely,
Mike Ferrando
Washington, DC
p.s. What is strange is that SAXON obviously knows the file names it
is processing, so why can't I just call up that data into my output?
I guess the answer is to download the latest version.
--- TSchutzerWeissmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Mike Ferrando wrote:
> >[...]
> >My clip in Note Tab Pro that runs Saxon repeats the xsl file name
> for
> >the bat file as such:
> >[...]
>
> oh I get it, you just want to include the filename of the
> stylesheet, not
> the content of the document itself. Aha. Your earlier mail
> suggested
> otherwise.
>
> Yes, telling the stylesheet its own filename via a parameter is as
> good a
> way as any; you can't access it using xslt proper, although
> depending on
> your parser there might be an extension that will.
> Personally I don't see what's so wrong with hardcoding the filename
> into the
> stylesheet itself.
>
> Regards,
> Tom Weissmann (aka Tom Schutzer-Weissmann, i must mind those
> parameters...)
>
> XSL-List info and archive:
> http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|