> why would you want to use the obsolete wd-language?

I don't recommend that you do, but there are many (now legacy)
applications of WD-xsl. BTW, for folks trapped in that obsolete dialect,
Microsoft does provide a tool for converting WD-xsl to XSLT 1.0.

>Sure you have to limit yourself to msxml3
>but at least it supports the full xslt spec and msxml4 improvements
aren't
>that big a deal anyways

MSXML 4.0 represents a four to eight times improvement in processing
throughput over MSXML 3.0. Some folks might consider that is a big deal.


Cheers,
Stuart


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list