[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
While I'm not a fan of EXSL, I feel offended for them -- they never intended to propose extension functions for incrementing an xsl:variable -- or am I wrong Jeny? Frankly, I'm not sure about intentions of EXSLTers, but since both WD 1.1 and 2.0 introduce an additional type of external object to be used with extensions, the idea of mutable variable isn't so surprising to me. xsl:variable can either be bound to an external object with one or more mutable properties or you don't need xsl:variable at all. Nobody speaks of incrementing an xsl:variable. Incrementing a variable is not a non-XSLT problem due to two reasons: Speaking of intentions, is it what XSLT has been intended for? I'm not advocating extensions or mutable variables/properties. My point is that there may be situations, where the extension approach can be more convenient than recursive calls of templates or other solutions, such as data preprocessing. Depends on what are priorities.
A friend of mine says: Never say a problem, say a challenge. He's right :)
Thanks for kind words; I will definitely look for a good book on XSLT in my favorite bookstore. Petr -- Petr Cimprich Ginger Alliance www.gingerall.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



