On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:04:52PM -0800, Ross Lambert wrote:
> XSL was--and is--a "catch all" for everything having to do with transforming
> XML from one form to another. As things evolved, it grew in three strands, a
> transformation language (XSLT), a searching language (XPath), and XSL to
> specify output styles. It gets a little fuzzy because you can't really do
> one thing without help from the others.
You'll also find people using the term "XSL" (incorrectly) to refer to
the transformation language Microsoft implemented in IE5, which was a
subset of an early draft of XSL (before XSLT existed).
--
Matt Gushee
Englewood, Colorado, USA
mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.havenrock.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- XSL v. XSLT
- David B. Bitton - Sun, 17 Mar 2002 23:11:55 -0500 (EST)
- Ross Lambert - Sun, 17 Mar 2002 23:54:15 -0500 (EST)
- Matt Gushee - Mon, 18 Mar 2002 02:15:19 -0500 (EST) <=
- Michael Kay - Mon, 18 Mar 2002 03:44:57 -0500 (EST)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- DPawson - Tue, 19 Mar 2002 04:28:43 -0500 (EST)
|
|
Cart
