Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 03:30 PM 2/6/02, Corey wrote:
I've had this problem, too, when I wanted to output partial nodes. If you do But why this is neither a good idea, nor necessary, is an extremely frequent topic of discussion on this list. It's a mistake to think you're outputting a "partial node" like this. What you are outputting is a string which, if your processor implements this optional feature (and there's no "should" about it), can be parsed as a tag. If you're really careful or lucky, this may create an effect you want downstream. If you're not, your output will just be broken. The price of this workaround will go up as we get more XSL systems that don't serialize their output at all. Cheers, Wendell ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
