[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Paul,
Before we tell you how to do this, tell us why you want to so we can put on our Thought Police uniforms to tell you why it's not a good idea. Really -- 99 times out of a hundred, this is a very poor solution to a common problem that has better solutions. And it's a FAQ. For example -- let's say your problem is that your input <one>1</one> <two>2</two> <one>3</one> <two>4</two> <one>5</one> <two>6</two> needs to come back as <pair> <one>1</one> <two>2</two> </pair> <pair> <one>3</one> <two>4</two> </pair> <pair> <one>5</one> <two>6</two> </pair> A clean, conformant solution is <xsl:template match="one">
<pair>
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
<xsl:copy-of select="following-sibling::two[1]"/>
</pair>
</xsl:template><xsl:template match="two"/> But what you want to do will not work in all XSL implementations, and is not required by the spec to be supported by a processor. Cheers, Wendell Cheers, Wendell At 12:33 PM 2/6/02, you wrote: Hi all, Very simply, I'm trying to do the following: ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



