Subject: Re: attribute order
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:00:31 GMT
|
> (There is universal consensus that in XML, element order is important but
> attribute order isn't. There is nothing explicit in the XML specification
> that says this, but it's made clear in the definition of the InfoSet.)
Actually a sentence making this explicit was added in XML 2e:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006-review.html#sec-starttags
... Note that the order of attribute specifications in a start-tag or
empty-element tag is not significant.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- RE: attribute order, (continued)
- Hunsberger, Peter - Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:50:04 -0500 (EST)
- Meltem Kogelbauer - Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:16:45 -0500 (EST)
- Andy Joslin - Fri, 22 Feb 2002 05:01:15 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Fri, 22 Feb 2002 05:29:24 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Fri, 22 Feb 2002 05:58:18 -0500 (EST) <=
- Michael Kay - Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:49:03 -0500 (EST)
- Daniel Veillard - Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:17:03 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:45:43 -0500 (EST)
- Andrew Welch - Fri, 22 Feb 2002 06:28:53 -0500 (EST)
|
|