Subject: Re: XSL:FO and Unicode Fonts
From: "Joerg Heinicke" <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 18:33:26 +0100
|
> Is it impolite to ask a XSL:FO question here?
> If so, could you please suggest a more aprt forum?
It's ok. The list is about XSL, i.e. XSLT + XSL:FO.
> And...is it impolite to ask about Unicode font support?
> If not, how are people handling rendering of high UTF-8
> characters on a WIndows platform, as BOLD and ITALIC
> and BOLD ITALIC?
It's not the first question according Unicode ;-)
> I'm using the standard ArialUnicodeMS font, but it doesn't
> support Bold and Italic (according to Apache FOP), so when
> I do <xsl:fo wrapper font-family="ArialUnicodeMS" font-style="italic">,
> I get a 'no such font' error.
I don't understand the real problem, maybe it's really a font problem. But
why don't youe use "normal" Arial and change the encoding of your XSL:FO
from UTF-8 to (for example) ISO-8859-1?
> Does anyone know of a freeware Type I or TTF font Unicode font
> with all glyphs present?
>
> Or -- has anyone written a stylesheet to manipulate the fonts to create
> a bold or italic effect? (The former sounds likely, the latter
impossible,
> but I am just guessing.)
>
> Thanks in anticipation of any pointers
> lee
Regards,
Joerg
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- RE: Content constructors and sequences, (continued)
- DPawson - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 06:24:27 -0500 (EST)
- Hunsberger, Peter - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:01:03 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:13:37 -0500 (EST)
- Lee Goddard - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:16:56 -0500 (EST)
- Joerg Heinicke - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:30:13 -0500 (EST) <=
- David Carlisle - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:48:32 -0500 (EST)
- Jeff Kenton - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:13:48 -0500 (EST)
- Joerg Pietschmann - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:49:22 -0500 (EST)
|
|