Subject: Re: XPath 2.0
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:45:43 GMT
|
> Does anyone on this list care that "<<", when used in XSLT, would have to be
> written as "a<<b"?
not too much
a) it's only twice as bad as < and not too many people have complained
about that.
b) As with < you'd almost always be able to easily restructure your
query in terms of >> if it bothered you.
c) Anyone rash enough to use an XML editor to type their XSLT files
instead of using emacs can presumably type << anyway.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: XPath 2.0, (continued)
- Jeni Tennison - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:02:00 -0500 (EST)
- Miloslav Nic - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:19:46 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:12:54 -0500 (EST)
- Evan D. Lenz - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:40:32 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:45:01 -0500 (EST) <=
- Evan Lenz - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:12:29 -0500 (EST)
- naha - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:17:16 -0500 (EST)
David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:25:30 -0500 (EST)
|
|