Subject: Re: Regular expression functions (Was: Re: comments on December F&O draft)
From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:48:43 +0000
|
David,
>> I think a lot of this could be refined, but that as a general approach
>> it might be feasible. Any thoughts?
>
> yes this is sort of more like I had in mind
Oh well good. Are you ready to write up a proposal now?
Cool. The one thing about your example that it would have some trouble
with is handling the \frac{...}{...} construction, I think - you'd
have to go through some intermediate grouping stage to merge any
string that started with { with its preceding string (this is
difficult because you can't get hold of preceding items in a
sequence).
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: Regular expression functions (Was: Re: comments on December F&O draft), (continued)
- David Carlisle - Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:10:31 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:32:21 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Sun, 13 Jan 2002 05:26:50 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Sun, 13 Jan 2002 08:04:01 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Sun, 13 Jan 2002 10:13:09 -0500 (EST) <=
- Chris Bayes - Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:11:42 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Mon, 14 Jan 2002 06:02:01 -0500 (EST)
- Chris Bayes - Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:02:44 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:59:20 -0500 (EST)
|
|