Subject: Re: XPath 2.0
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:39:23 GMT
|
> But you never did that anyway.
did so:-) (he lies)
yes I think it's correct to say that they've done a good job walking a
compatibilty tight-rope here, and I don't think many if any real
stylesheets will be affected by this, but I can't help feeling some
unease at where there was a former clean lisp-ish empty list/set =
false non-empty = true semantics, there is now almost the same effect
but only via following some rather more convoluted conversion rules.
Price of progress perhaps...
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: How to know if an attribute is defaulted, (continued)
- Ed Blachman - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:37:09 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:58:54 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:26:17 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:38:45 -0500 (EST) <=
- Michael Kay - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 04:38:26 -0500 (EST)
- Brinkman, Theodore - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:24:24 -0500 (EST)
- DPawson - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 05:58:47 -0500 (EST)
- DPawson - Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:14:09 -0500 (EST)
|
|