Subject: Re: . in for
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:55:40 -0800 (PST)
|
[snipped a very nice and perfectly understandable argumentation for a mapping
operator]
> I can see two drawbacks to using a simple mapping operator rather than
> a for expression, because the context item is used rather than there
> being explicit variable bindings for range variables:
>
> - you cannot iterate over several sequences at the same time
> - you cannot have right operands that use the value of the item from
> the left operand within a predicate
Jeni,
This is the only part of your message, which seems not to be 100% clear.
Could you, please, provide concrete examples (expressions) that would be
illegal/would not work?
Cheers,
Dimitre.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: . in for
- Dimitre Novatchev - Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:54:59 -0500 (EST) <=
|
|