Tobias wrote:

>Jeni kindly provided me this one:
>
>  *[* and
>     not(*/node()) and
>     not(*[not(@style)]) and
>     not(*/@style != */@style)]

Hi Tobias, Jeni:

maybe a dumb question but why all the "not"s (and writhing and fainting in
coils?)
wouldn't 
*[* and not(*/node()) and (*/@style) and (*/@style = */@style)] 
work the same way?

Tom S-W



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list