I knew I'd get that question. And I suspected it would be from DavidC ;) 

Ofcourse discussion related to XSL-FO is welcome, although www-xsl-fo
is not a bad place for that. But it is no mystery that the WG is
working almost 100% on XSLT/XPath, and that comments on this topic are
mainly expected.

Still, I encourage FO enthusiasts to submit requirements for XSL 2.0.

Max.

David wrote:

>>People are invited to join the mailing list in order to exchange views
>>on the XSLT language and its development.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list