Subject: RE: Selection based on date comparison
From: Jeff Beadle <Jbeadle@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:42:58 -0500
|
sorry, after reading my replay I guess I should be a little clearer ...
>> why not use a parser extension, like msxsl for msxsl. You could
construct
I meant "msxsl for msxml", in other words use msxsl:script elements.
>> javascript date objects and compare them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Beadle
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:24 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Selection based on date comparison
why not use a parser extension, like msxsl for msxsl. You could construct
javascript date objects and compare them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Campillo [mailto:dcampillo@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:15 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Selection based on date comparison
>But the date format you choose is unsuited for compraision. Use
>something like 20010603.
>If you cant, you will have to use substring().
>
Unfortunately, the date format is beyond my control at the moment, I
understand I will have to use substring() in order to compare the dates.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
