Subject: RE: xslt on server-side vs. client-side
From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:30:20 -0000
|
> Boy, that seems a leap. Ever had to field the support calls
> that come in when you upgrade a users browser from what they
> are used to? (Or for that matter, ever had to manage the
> support costs associated with upgrading 2000 copies of IE 5
> to use MSXML 3?)
I have an automatic installation page on my site if you want to use
that.
Hey why don't we convert everything on the server to a gif + image map
and send that to the browser?
Oh damn then david wouldn't be able to see it with his lynx.
Ciao Chris
XML/XSL Portal
http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- RE: xslt on server-side vs. client-side, (continued)
- Hunsberger, Peter - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 12:19:13 -0500 (EST)
- Nate Austin - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:32:12 -0500 (EST)
- Hunsberger, Peter - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:28:56 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:13:22 -0500 (EST)
- Chris Bayes - Mon, 19 Nov 2001 05:29:57 -0500 (EST) <=
- David Carlisle - Mon, 19 Nov 2001 06:08:58 -0500 (EST)
- Hunsberger, Peter - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:24:54 -0500 (EST)
- Hunsberger, Peter - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:33:43 -0500 (EST)
|
|
Cart
