Subject: RE: xslt on server-side vs. client-side
From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:21:42 -0000
|
Nathalie,
Advantages.
Speed of response.
Less network traffic.
Greater client control of style.
Removal of workload from the server.
Lower electricity bills.
Disadvantages.
Hmmmmm
Ummmmm
Lack of good xml/xslt aware clients.
Ciao Chris
XML/XSL Portal
http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Nathalie Pult
> Sent: 16 November 2001 09:47
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: xslt on server-side vs. client-side
>
>
> Hi List,
> I already worked with xslt on server-side.
>
> Now, for a new (small) project, I'm thinking about putting
> more transformation-ops on client-side.
>
> What are the advantages and disadvantages having operations
> done on client-side?
>
> Thank you for answers or links!
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- xsl:if and javascript, (continued)
- TP - Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:31:57 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 04:30:37 -0500 (EST)
- Nathalie Pult - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 04:46:24 -0500 (EST)
- cutlass - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 05:20:52 -0500 (EST)
- Chris Bayes - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 05:21:25 -0500 (EST) <=
- Michael Kay - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 05:46:00 -0500 (EST)
- TP - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:44:06 -0500 (EST)
- cutlass - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:49:41 -0500 (EST)
- Chris Bayes - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:20:51 -0500 (EST)
|
|
Cart
