Subject: RE: xslt on server-side vs. client-side
From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:53:29 -0600
|
> you're joking, right? this is kind of like going to McDonalds and ordering
a
> Big Mac, large fries WITH A diet coke as opposed to a regular coke.
If you want to argue about whether client side vs. server side in general
can save electricity I don't think one could come up with a definitive
answer. However, for the simple case of performing the same XSLT transform
1000 times in one place or another (no repetition on the client) I think
it's pretty clear. So, no, it's not a joke...
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Chris Bayes - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:13:25 -0500 (EST)
David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:24:45 -0500 (EST)
Hunsberger, Peter - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:53:29 -0500 (EST) <=
Hunsberger, Peter - Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:42:53 -0500 (EST)
|
|