Subject: RE: XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)?
From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:20:22 +0200
|
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael Kay
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:10 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate
> unqualified locals)?
>
>
> > Michael> (4) people don't understand the arbitrariness of some of
> > Michael> the rules, e.g. that the default namespace can go out of
> > Michael> scope for descendants but an explicit namespace can't
> >
> > I'm one of those people - can you give an illustration please?
>
>
> You can say xmlns="" to cancel the default namespace declaration, but you
> can't do xmlns:xyz="" to cancel a non-default namespace declaration.
However, some XML parsers do not catch this:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3040
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|