> The case of attributes would have been more touchy (maybe the attributes 
> were really a bad idea in XML, after all) but I am convinced we could 
> find a way to express the PSVI by adding elements and attributes in a 
> specific namespace instead of creating new information items...

I almost started down this path but found I didn't understand the guts well
enough to come up with a plausible syntax and/or example.  This certainly
would get me what I need.  Moreover, unless I get paranoid about trying to
reflect super classes and multiple inheritance I believe that this would
suffice for just about all needs?


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list