Michael Kay wrote:
> 
> I think it was just priorities, coupled with insufficient experience in the
> early days of actual user requirements. Extension functions were thought to
> be needed primarily for access to external resources, and to algorithms (e.g
> regexp) which no one would dream of coding in XSLT. Of course that changed
> over time and the requirement to write extension functions in XSLT is now in
> the published XSLT 2.0 requirements.
> 
Thanks - sorry for the extended moan!

Francis.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list