Subject: Re: ***********Transformation of an XML document containing a default namespace ************
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Oct 2001 19:22:41 +0100
|
>>>>> "David" == David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
David> According to the spec, you _never_ get any control over th
David> eprefixes used, and it is perfectly OK for an XSLT
David> serialiser to always use prefixes like kmsqzzxss1:
David> kmsqzzxss2: .... even if the stylesheet uses fo: or
That rather depends upon what your definition of perfectly OK is.
---------
Sure, it's OK to do it, as the XSLT spec allows it, but perfect?
Canonical XML has a very different idea on this, and the spec for it
lays out it's reasons.
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
