-- Michael Kay [Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:51:44 +0100]:
>>?turns out the problem wasn't with the &amp in the URI. ?I'd
>>?tacked on .xml on the end which was resulting in:
>>
>>?default.asp?person=p1&tree=vitiello.xml
>>
>>?the xml was making the browser think it was XML (which,
>>?actually it is...) but the browser was somehow confused as to
>>?what to do with it.
>>
>>?anyhow, chopped off the .xml, and it loads perfectly.
>>
>>?Don't I look like the moron? =)
>>
>No, I think the people who wrote the browser and decided to treat
>the ".xml"
>in your URL as an indication of the content type it would return are
>the
>ones who look like morons. I spent an afternoon once solving the same
>problem.
>
>Mike Kay
>
>
>?XSL-List info and archive: ?http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>

especially when I am setting the Content-Type in the HTTP headers!


eric
perceive designs
<www.perceive.net>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list