Subject: Re: XPath 2.0: Collection-Valued Expressions (Was: Re: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0)
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:48:32 +0100
|
> I think it would be much more useful if you made points like this in formal
> comments sent to the working group via the feedback mechanism identified in
> the document.
Jeni's probably in bed so I'll raise again the point she did mention.
She _tried_ to post to the comments list but it bounced her.
The only non-spam messages in the archive are from me and Dave P.
We both have W3C access, are you sure that the public comment list is
set up for public comments?
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: XPath 2.0: Collection-Valued Expressions (Was: Re: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0), (continued)
- Jeni Tennison - Sun, 9 Sep 2001 05:43:57 -0400 (EDT)
- Jeni Tennison - Sun, 9 Sep 2001 06:57:57 -0400 (EDT)
- Mark Nahabedian - Sun, 9 Sep 2001 08:12:28 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Sun, 9 Sep 2001 18:19:23 -0400 (EDT)
- David Carlisle - Sun, 9 Sep 2001 19:56:57 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Jeni Tennison - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:53:10 -0400 (EDT)
- Kurt Cagle - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:33:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Jim Melton - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:53:58 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:47:51 -0400 (EDT)
|
|