Subject: Re: xmlc
From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:17:27 -0700
|
One major problem, I feel, is that it does not work with XML files, just
HTML. (maybe it has changed???).
I think XSLT is much better in this aspect :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Galbreath" <mgalbrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: xmlc
> Never heard of it (but I'm new to this game); what is it?
>
> Cheers!
> Mark
>
> >
> > From: Kevin_Gutch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: 2001/08/17 Fri PM 03:43:38 EDT
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: xmlc
> >
> >
> > I just wanted to find out if anyone on this list uses XMLC or has an
> > opinion about it. It definitely creates Object oriented web pages but
does
> > not seem to separate content as well as XSLT can. Any thoughts.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
> >
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- xmlc
- Kevin_Gutch - Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:50:00 -0400 (EDT)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Mark Galbreath - Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
- Robert Koberg - Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:34:44 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Wate - Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
- Kevin_Gutch - Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:25:45 -0400 (EDT)
- Mark Galbreath - Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:35:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Brennan - Fri, 17 Aug 2001 20:05:08 -0400 (EDT)
|
|