Subject: RE: what can you do with {} and @@ (was: Generating Link References)
From: "Clapham, Paul" <pclapham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:30:56 -0700
|
You did, but at least for me, your follow-up arrived several minutes before
the post it was referring to. Perhaps there's a theory of relativity for
mailing lists?
PC2
-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: June 29, 2001 03:40
To: RdVries@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: what can you do with {} and @@ (was: Generating Link
References)
> Are the double @@ necessary to get one @?
No, as I indicated (I thought) in my follow up, the two @@ were a typo
there should just be one.
David
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|