Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:54:46 -0500 (EST)
|
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > In other words: only one exsl:result element should be instantiated
> > when the content of exsl:function is processed - if more than one is
> > instantiated then only the first actually matters, the rest are
> > ignored.
>
> Should it be the first or the last that is accepted?
>
I think the roles of "building the result" and "returning" control
should be distinct; see my previous e-mail.
Clark
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template), (continued)
- Jeni Tennison - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 05:07:03 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:25:05 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:33:03 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:39:58 -0500 (EST)
- Clark C. Evans - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:51:15 -0500 (EST) <=
- Michael Kay - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:08:35 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Wed, 21 Feb 2001 06:01:16 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:55:57 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:18:31 -0500 (EST)
|
|