Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> does this mean you would favour XSLT extensions in XSLT
>(<saxon:function> style)

I don't know of anyone who's against this.  It's a matter of getting the
design right... there are complications when you get into the details.  I
would rather see this laid on top of XSLT 2.0, since I think there are type
system ramifications.

I wrote:
> designs for things like the document() function

Sorry,  I meant the document element, i.e. multiple output docs.  Duh.

-scott






 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list