Subject: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:13:11 +0000
|
David Carlisle wrote:
>
<snip good explanation>
>
> There is no way for a named template to emulate copy-of which is one
> reeasons why viewing XSLT functions as syntaxtic sugar for named
> templates may not be quite the right thing and you need something like
> saxon:return.
>
Thank you - I *was* being lazy!
Francis.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
