Subject: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:49:10 GMT
|
> I was just suggesting that there be a "xf" namespace
> such that:
Oh yes, so you were, sorry!
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template), (continued)
- Jeni Tennison - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:32:57 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:50:59 -0500 (EST)
- Clark C. Evans - Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:53:08 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:17:27 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:51:43 -0500 (EST) <=
- Clark C. Evans - Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:42:16 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:33:27 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:41:51 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:53:12 -0500 (EST)
|
|
Cart
