Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:12:02 -0700
|
> Hi Jeni,
>
> > I think the upshot of this is that unless we introduce a proper
> > construct like (test ? true : false) that only evaluates the relevant
> > expression, we *have* to enable xsl:if/xsl:choose to be specified
> > within function declarations. An exsl:if() function will not be
> > sufficient.
>
> That's correct.
Well, I definitely think an exsl:ternary() extension function should be on our
list to consider.
--
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
