Subject: Re: XSLT 1.1 comments (portability)
From: Joe English <jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:57:09 -0800
|
David Carlisle wrote:
> which relates to a question I was going to ask about what do people mean
> by a portable stylesheet.
>
> One that doesn't use features of XSLT declared to be system independent
>
> or
>
> One that works uniformly on the XSL engines you have available.
Following C terminology, I usually use "portable" to mean the second
and "strictly conforming" to mean the first.
--Joe English
jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|