> Hmm... I wonder if:
> 
>   contains(source, find) and not(substring-after(source, find))
> 
> would be any faster [to implement ends-with(source, find)]? 

It might be faster but it's wrong.

Try ends-with("Tennison", "n")

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list