> If volume is increasing, perhaps Mulberrytech might think
> again about running a seperate list for XSLT-FO?
> Regards DaveP

Great idea (and was whenever it was first suggested).  This xsl list is the
best list in the history of listserves, but it has a definite XSLT bias.  It
would be interesting to see how many participants actually use FO at all.

There is definitely a subset of "XSL" users who are interested in only the
transformation part, and there is also a subset that are more focused on
(and/or more eager to receive e-mails on an instant basis about) FO.

I would think it best if Mullberrytech either changes this to cover just
XSLT (referring FO to the eGroups site) or starts an FO list.

Max
http://www.siliconpublishing.org/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list