[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: RE: qname + uri
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 10:13:24 -0000
> In a testing application I'm writing, I have a need to 
> 1.validate  a given ID value as being a valid qname.

The current version of Saxon has a static method
com.icl.saxon.om.Name#isQName() which should be very easy to call from XSLT.
> 
> 2. I also need to validate a uri + fragment as being valid.

I've come to the conclusion that isn't possible. A URI is only valid if it
uses a protocol name that has been registered, and the set of registered
protocols changes with time. Saxon allows any string to be used as a URI,
until it's dereferenced, at which point it must be a URL acceptable to Java.

Mike Kay 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
  • qname + uri
    • Dave Pawson - Tue, 2 Jan 2001 13:19:39 -0500 (EST)
      • <Possible follow-ups>
      • Kay Michael - Wed, 3 Jan 2001 05:11:02 -0500 (EST) <=
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member