Subject: Re: the nearest ancestor with the attribute
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:16:37 GMT
|
> Actually isn't it
>
> ancestor::*[@attr][1]/@attr
yes, although usually people want to do this to get "inherited" values,
in which case,it wants to be:
ancestor-or-self::*[@attr][1]/@attr
or
(ancestor-or-self::*/@attr)[last()]
which coincidentally is exactly the same length (for this attribute
name).
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
DPawson - Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:25:42 -0500 (EST)
DPawson - Thu, 18 Jan 2001 03:50:40 -0500 (EST)
Oliver Becker - Thu, 18 Jan 2001 05:03:08 -0500 (EST)
|
|
Cart
