Subject: RE: Carrying Namespaces through a XSL to XSL Transformation
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:56:00 -0000
|
Evan Lenz:
> (Incidentally, I seem to
> remember finding that the node-set solution was extremely
> slower, when using
> SAXON and a large stylesheet, than serializing, parsing, and
> doing another
> transformation, but that's another issue, particularly
> interesting with
> regard to v1.1 eliminating the need for the node-set function
> altogether--maybe Mike Kay can address this, but I continue
> to digress...)
I would expect that using node-set() would be significantly faster in most
cases, but it will also use more memory, so if it causes virtual memory
thrashing, it could become slower.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
