> > XML/XSLT is, internally (and externally through different
> > encodings), based on Unicode character handling.
> > Then wouldn't it be logical and desirable that the two functions
> > given here be part of the standard XSLT function reportoire?
> > (e.g. XSLT v1.1)?

Once we have a standard Java binding then the whole Java class library will
become part of the standard XSLT function repertoire. Isn't that a better
way to handle such requirements?

Yes, I do know there will be processors that don't support the Java
binding...

Mike Kay



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list